Logo courtesy wordclouds.com
Textbooks are The Design of Everyday Things, Revised and Expanded Edition, published in 2013, by Don Norman. A classic in the field of usablity. Also, we will use part of the draft of a book by the professor. Copies of book chapters, in PDF format, will be made available to students (for free). Constructive feedback that can be used to improve the textbook will be gratefully appreciated.
Best way to contact Dr. Thomas: Email email@example.com
Important: put "cs3500" in the subject line of every email. Email without the "cs3500" might be automatically deleted by spam filters. Remember to sign your emails. You may know exactly who thingabuzzycooltoy@random_domain.com is, but I do not.
General Education Goals and Outcomes - the complete list.
CS 3500 particularly addresses:
Goal 2: Develop broad knowledge of biological and physical sciences, humanities and creative arts, and social sciences.
Students attaining the second learning goal will be able to:
Goal 3: Develop abilities to integrate knowledge, make informed ethical decisions, and accept civic responsibility.
Students attaining the third learning goal will be able to:
The final grade weighting of student work is estimated in the table below. The final weights should be close to those in the table, but circumstances may arise during the semester that force reweighting. (For example, if one of the homework assignments proves unusually difficult, the instructor may reduce the weight of that homework assignment and weight the other assignments higher.)
CR/NC grading may be requested only by filing a form in MSR by the appropriate deadline. See the Enrollment Services web page for more information about deadlines.
|Reflections on Assigned Reading
|Class Participation, etc
Reflections will be graded on a 3-point scale.
N.B. A student can earn an A in the class with all 3's for his/her reading reflections.
The essay author will post a good draft of the essay by 11:59 pm of the day due. Post essay drafts to the Draft Essays Assignments. The essay helpers / editors will post responses, as replies to the essay draft in Canvas, constructive suggestions for improving the essay, by 11:59 pm of the due day for comments. The final draft of the essay will be due by 11:59 pm on the specified day.
For each essay, the professor will post the list of student authors in the appropriate Assignment.
Student editors may pick the essays they edit, but should select essays in order to best ensure that all essays have multiple editors suggesting improvements. The professor reserves the right to change this policy if some student essays get lots of responses and some student essays get no help at all.
Student editors may earn up to 9 points total per week for editing posts. Each posted response to a different student essay draft may earn up to three points. A post containing a substantial paragraph of useful, constructive suggestions will earn 3 points. (Ineffective, unhelpful posts will earn zero points.)
Extra points are possible if a student editor chooses to respond to more than three essay drafts in a single week. The professor will keep track of such efforts. They may count towards participation or as extra credit, at the professor's discretion, at the end of the semester.
Final versions of all essays will be posted to the class Canvas Assignments, in the Final Essays Assignments. Essays will be 500 to 1,000 words (approximately one to two pages) -- no shorter than 500 words, no longer than 1,000 words. Titles, or name / class information that might be at the top of the essay, do not count as part of the 500 - 1,000 words. Use the default font size and formatting Canvas provides. I recommend composing your essay in a word processor program, then copying and pasting it in to the Canvas Assignment. (If Canvas crashes your web browser, you will still have your essay and can try again.)
Include a valid email address for you at the top of each essay, so that details of your essay grade can be emailed to you.
Essays will be made visible, within Canvas, to the other students in this class.
Essays will be reviews of various products, focusing on usability, and particularly on whatever usability topics we cover in class that week.
First, describe the product/item you are reviewing. Be succinct, but clear -- the grader should be able to uniquely identify the item based on your description. ("My TV" is vague. "My Samsung LN52B750, 52 inch, 1080p LCD TV purchased in 2009" is much better. N.B. Not the professor's TV, just a name picked off a list on a web site.) Feel free to include a photograph or drawing, if you think that is a good idea. The space taken up by the art will not count as part of the essay.
Perhaps, personalize the item -- why did you/someone you know buy it? What do you like? Dislike?
Analyze the usability of the item. Keep your focus on the topics of this week or the immediately previous week's lectures/readings. The week we cover human color perception, focus on the use of colors in your product. The week we cover physical constraints, focus on the use of physical constraints in the design of your product. And so forth.
Conclude and summarize. Give the product your personal recommendation (or not).
Write well! You are aiming to write so clear and useful a review that it would sail right to the top of any web page that ranks reviews by how useful they are to readers.
Advice on writing good reviews:
Essay Grading Rubric (20 points total):
|Unacceptable||Poor||Fair||Good||0||1-4 pts||5-7 pts||8-10 pts|
|Keyword Usage||No keywords from the current two weeks of class used in analysis, or keyword usage fails to illustrate clear understanding, or essay is off topic||Only a couple of current keywords used in analysis, or most keyword usage fails to illustrate clear understanding||Multiple, current keywords (3+) used in analysis, illustrating student correctly understands most of the keywords used||Multiple, current keywords (3+) used in analysis, illustrating student correctly understands the keywords used|
|0||1-3 pts||4-5 pts||6-7 pts|
|Writing / Analysis Quality||Essay is off topic.||Disorganized or incoherent prose. Unclear whether or why student likes/dislikes tool. One or more paragraphs are off-topic.||Moderately well organized, prose mostly coherent. Clear whether student likes/dislikes tool, though may not be clear why. Topic sentences may not be present for each paragraph.||Well organized, coherent prose. Clear whether and why students likes/dislikes tool.|
|0||1 pt||2 pts||3 pts|
|Grammar/spelling||Numerous grammar/spelling errors (1+ per paragraph); sentences that don't make sense.||Many grammar/spelling errors; no completely incomprehensible sentences||Some grammar/spelling errors||Few/no grammar/spelling errors|
If submitting the essay to Canvas gives you trouble, contact the professor promptly.
Students will be responsible for completing multiple essays that thoughtfully critique the design and usability of assorted tools. There will also be multiple group assignments where students analyze existing tools or design new tools. Specific information on assignments will be given out in class.
One of the major goals of the General Education courses is to improve student communication skills, so grammar and spelling always count for written assignments.
You may discuss general ideas about how to approach an assignment, but never specific details.
You may not show another student/group your solution to an assignment, nor look at his/her solution.
You may not have any another person "walk you through" an assignment, describe in detail about how to solve it, or sit with you as you write it. You also may not provide such help to another student. (The only exceptions to this ban are the course instructor and the CS lab system administrator.)
Under this policy, a student who gives inappropriate help is equally guilty with the student who receives it. Instead of providing such help to a student who does not understand the assignment, point them to course resources such as the lecture notes, the textbook, or the instructor.
You must also take reasonable steps to ensure that your work is not copied. Make sure to log out of shared computers, do not email your work to other students or post your work on the web, and do not leave printouts of your work in public places.
Students who violate this policy will receive no credit on the assignment, may receive an "F" in the course (at the instructor's discretion), and a report will be sent to the university Office of Judicial Affairs.
UCDavis has put an excellent guide to "ok" and "not ok" collaboration on homework assignments on-line. I recommend reading it.
(Credit for some of the phrasing of this academic integrity policy is due to Marty Stepp.)
You have one week after the grades for an assignment are given out to request regrading. You must give a good reason for the regrade request, and you should be aware that the assignment will be regraded from scratch. You may gain points... or lose them.
There are also a number of HCI books available electronically through Safari Books Online, which our library web site provides access to. (You must use your OIT user name and password to log in to Safari Books, from our Library web site.)
Documentaries and Movies: